Oilers rookie Connor McDavid thought he scored the game-tying goal against Jonathan Quick and the Kings on Sunday night with 3.8 seconds left in regulation, but the referees had something to say about that. The puck appeared to be in Quick's glove, and his glove behind the goal line, butthe refs ruled it wasn't a goal initially and the review didn't produceenough evidence to overturn the ruling. MORE: | You can judge for yourself from the different angles. This one shows where the puck is in Quick's glove relative to the goal line. oh well Stephanie (@myregularface) This shows what looks like the puck under Quick's glove, and it looks like it's all the way over the line. Thats a goal. Pete Blackburn (@PeteBlackburn) This gif from the Kings' Twitter feed looks a little Declan Chisholm Jersey le s convincing, because of course it would. child plz LA Kings (@LAKings) Here's another look courtesy of Rob Tychkowski of the Edmonton Sun. Rob Tychkowski (@Sun_Tychkowski) Helene Elliott of the Los Angeles Times explained what likely led to the initial call. On replays it looked like ref expected to find puck in the back of the net. When he didn't see it--cuz it was in Quick's glove--he waved no Helene Elliott (@helenenothelen) But hold everything, here's John Shannon from Sportsnet explaining why our eyes might be deceiving us with this explainer from the 2015 playoffs. NHL ops , "At 19:56 of the third period in theLos Angeles Kings/Edmonton Oilersgame, video review was inconclusive in determining ifConnor McDavid's shot completely cro sed the Kings goal line. Therefore the referee's call on the ice stands - no goal Edmonton." That's a tough way to lose a game (the Oilers lost 3-2). Better luck next time, kid. Marcus Johansson Jersey